If you go for a lightweight tripod you can always use a stone bag to add some pounds. A stone bag is just a bag that you hang from the bottom of the center column that you fill with stones to add some weight.
When you are done shooting you dump the bag leaving the stones where you found them and off you go continuing your adventure with your lightweight tripod. The first thing I would consider is height.
Look for a tripod that is tall enough so that if you are aiming the camera at a high object, for example, an eagle in a tree or some detail on top of a tall building, you don't need to crouch down to look through your camera. Also on the question of height, one of the accepted facts is that your camera is going to be held more still if it is on a tripod that is tall enough without raising the center column or at least not having to raise it to the maximum height. Tripods that get tall are generally longer when collapsed so they tend to be harder to transport.
But, not always. Some tripods have more leg sections than others, and many of these get tall enough and close down compact enough that they are still convenient to carry. Taller tripods also tend to be on the heavier side. This brings me to the material used in the construction of the tripod. A carbon fiber tripod that can reach the height you are looking for and have enough leg sections so that it collapses down to a nice size for transport may not be much different in weight than an aluminum tripod that is shorter and does not collapse.
But everything comes with a price. True, a carbon fiber tripod with more leg sections is going to cost you more money. The cost-benefit analysis is something that each person has to calculate themselves. One person may be willing to carry more weight than another person. A shorter person may decide they do not need a taller set of legs.
Then there is the person that does not care what it is going to cost. My compliments! The type of leg locks is one option. Some people prefer the clip locks. Some people prefer twist locks. That is a matter of personal choice. I have both types so I suppose I can not be much help with that. You will have to see which one you like.
I will say that the clip locks are faster. Occasionally the clip locks may need to have the tension screw adjusted so that they lock properly. The twist locks never need to be adjusted. Some have center columns that can tip sideways for shooting straight down or allowing your lens to get very close to the ground for those shots of tiny mushrooms. Most of the tripods you will encounter today have legs that kick out so you can adjust the angle of the legs. Sorry to tell you, but for studio photography, you need a different tripod than a tripod for travel photography.
The first thing you need to ask yourself is: what photographic genre am I looking for a tripod for? So what is better in the end? Surely both are useful to take the weight off your neck; they offer a level of resistance to vibrations greater than the free hand. The tripod is more stable, but tends to be very bulky and can slow you down.
On the other hand, the monopod is not as stable but is much more versatile. You have to know and understand what type of situation you are going to shoot in. If you have to be mobile and fast on the move you have to choose the monopod. If, on the other hand, you have to take long exposures for example, blur the water of a waterfall , a tripod is better. If you want flexibility, you may need both. Some tripods are two in one! They easily convert from tripod into monopod in a matter of seconds.
There are usually two models. The first converts the central tripod pole into a monopod. The other option works by removing a leg and connecting it to the central column. Usually the latter models have more limitations, but they also have more stable blocks. But, another huge benefit of monopods is that they can accommodate a lot of weight. Ever been watching an NFL game and see those photographers and videographers on the sidelines with their impossibly huge lenses?
This thing will support a whopping In fact, it ranges from Some monopods also have a miniature tripod base to improve stability. While some monopods like the MA described earlier have their own set of feet, by and large, they have just one point of contact with the ground. This means less stability than a tripod, and even if the monopod has multiple fold-out feet, you still have to hold onto it so it remains upright.
Photo by Jovanni Frenshyte on Unsplash. They offer the capability of supporting a ton of weight without being bulky or difficult to transport. Some monopods even have beefy, padded grips for easier handling and multiple feet for additional stability. It would be best if you still kept a hand on your monopod at all times. A video monopod usually consists of a monopod, a small fluid head and a monopod tripod foot. You can assemble the pieces individually or buy them as a kit from brands such as Manfrotto or iFootage.
As you can see, there are many situations in which either a tripod or a monopod is useful. While some of these situations overlap, there are also several situations where only one of the options truly makes sense. For this reason, it is common for photographers to own both a monopod and a tripod. Instead, look at the information in this tutorial and ask yourself what kind of photography you will be doing the most and where you will be doing it.
This will help you prioritize your purchase. Among other things, it allows you to create beautiful long exposures with smooth water and capture the Milky Way and the Northern Lights. For sports photographers, a monopod makes the most sense. Some tripods can convert into a monopod. This is achieved by unscrewing one of the tripod legs, removing the top platform from the tripod and adding it to that leg.
A great example of this is the 3-Legged Thing Bucky tripod. For people who think they might need both a monopod and a tripod, it can save you some money. When it comes to camera support, there is no such thing as a free lunch. While this ability to transform can be handy and save you some money, these tripods usually sacrifice some stability in tripod mode, compared to ones that do not have this feature.
If you research products that do include this ability to transform, you will quickly realize that big, sturdy tripods such as those from Gitzo, Manfrotto and Rally Right Stuff are not on the list.
The question of monopod vs tripod is one of mobility vs stability when it comes down to it. A tripod will always be more stable than a monopod, and a monopod will always be lighter and smaller than a tripod. Dan Carr. Thank you for a most interesting and comprehesive explantion of tripod vs monopod. I have a tripod which has the facility to use the one leg as a monod but to date have not tried to use the monopod.
It is something that I will certainly trying out in the near future,. It raises up to get the macro lens above he subject! Very cool! Your email address will not be published or shared. Please note that if you include a link in your comment, it will have to be moderated first before it appears on the site. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. By submitting a comment this form also collects your name, email and IP address so that we can prevent spam.
0コメント